Table 4.
Estimated parameters for alcohol model in a school sample of adolescents assessed over 5 yearsa.
Working memory | Perceptual reasoning | Delayed recall memory | Inhibition control | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | SE | p | Estimate | SE | p | Estimate | SE | p | Estimate | SE | p | |
Intercept | 21.54 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 15.12 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 17.71 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 37.80 | 2.97 | 0.00 |
Time | −6.50 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 0.27 | 0.00 | −9.57 | 0.33 | 0.00 | −9.41 | 1.98 | 0.00 |
Time squared | 0.79 | 0.17 | 0.00 | −0.09 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
SES* | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.15 | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.04 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.38 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
Gender (female) | 1.74 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 1.21 | 0.92 | 0.19 |
Alcohol, B* | −0.41 | 0.32 | 0.20 | −0.03 | 0.10 | 0.74 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.22 | 0.61 | 0.72 |
Alcohol, W* | −0.20 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.62 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.42 |
Alcohol, W (lagged) | −0.10 | 0.18 | 0.57 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.75 | −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.66 | −0.80 | 0.35 | 0.02 |
Gender (male) × alcohol, B | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.97 | 0.28 | 0.85 | 0.74 |
Gender (male) × alcohol, W | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.61 | −0.12 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.98 | −0.16 | 0.49 | 0.75 |
Gender (male) × alcohol, W (lagged) | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.90 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.18 |
aSignificant effects are indicated by boldface. Performance on working memory and inhibitory control tasks was measured by counting number of errors; a lower score indicates a better performance. *SES, socioeconomic status; B, between-subjects; W, within-subjects. Bold values correspond to significant predictors.