Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;8(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.69

Table 6. Comparison of primary care practitioners who have referred patients to the bariatric program versus those who have not.

Variables Referred (n=89) (%) Never referred (n=35) (%) P value
Percent recommending patients for bariatric surgery 11.7±15.1 11.3±21.6 0.91
Percent estimating T2DM resolution 54.4±22.6 39.0±20.1 0.003
Percent estimating HTN resolution 49.4±21.0 38.8±19.6 0.032
Percent estimating DLD resolution 45.5±23.5 37.6±19.1 0.148
Percent estimating OSA resolution 53.7±22.7 47.2±21.5 0.228
Location of practice, n (%) 0.841
   Same RHA 54 (60.7) 22 (62.9)
   Different RHA 35 (39.3) 13 (37.1)
Comfortable with non-operative obesity management, n (%) 1
   Agree 73 (83.0) 29 (82.9)
   Disagree 15 (17.0) 6 (17.1)
Comfortable with operative obesity management, n (%) <0.001
   Agree 50 (56.8) 6 (17.1)
   Disagree 38 (43.2) 29 (82.9)
Comfortable with bariatric surgery post-operative care, n (%) 0.004
   Agree 60 (67.4) 13 (38.2)
   Disagree 29 (32.6) 21 (61.8)
Residency training in managing bariatric surgery patients, n (%) 0.19
   Agree 7 (7.9) 0 (0)
   Disagree 82 (92.1) 34 (100.0)
Previous CME in obesity management, n (%) 0.084
   Agree 35 (39.3) 15 (42.9)
   Disagree 54 (60.7) 20 (57.1)

T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; DLD, dyslipidemia; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; RHA, regional health authority; CME, continuing medical education.