Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 24;2015(10):CD003478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003478.pub5

Comparison 1. Oral/topical non‐absorbed antifungal prophylaxis vs placebo or nothing.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Incidence of invasive fungal infection 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 All VLBW infants 4 1800 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.14, 0.27]
1.2 Only ELBW infants 1 349 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.12 [0.06, 0.26]
2 Mortality 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 All VLBW infants 4 1800 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.72, 1.05]
2.2 Only ELBW infants 1 349 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.51, 2.25]
3 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia 1 171 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.29 [0.67, 2.49]
4 Necrotising enterocolitis 1 185 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.40, 2.33]
5 Retinopathy of prematurity 1 177 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.30, 1.28]
6 Length of stay in NICU (days) 3 833 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.52 [‐4.34, 3.29]