Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 24;2015(10):CD003478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003478.pub5

Comparison 2. Oral/topical non‐absorbed prophylaxis vs. systemic antifungal prophylaxis.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Incidence of invasive fungal infection 3 326 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.89 [0.66, 5.39]
2 Mortality 3 326 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.39 [0.64, 3.00]
3 Bronchopulmonary dysplasia 1 171 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.29 [0.67, 2.49]
4 Necrotising enterocolitis 2 267 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.58, 2.60]
5 Retinopathy of prematurity 1 171 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.51, 2.98]
6 Length of stay in NICU (days) 1 171 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.0 [‐7.63, 5.63]