Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003897.pub3

Daclizumab triple 1998.

Methods
  • Parallel RCT

Participants
  • International multi centre study: USA (15), Canada (3), Sweden (3)

  • First cadaveric kidney transplant

  • Mean age ± SD

    • Treatment: 47 ± 13

    • Control: 47 ± 13

  • Number (treatment/control): 260 (134/126)

  • Sex (M/F)

    • Treatment: 74/52

    • Control: 81/53

Interventions Treatment group
  • Daclizumab: Five doses of 1 mg/kg. First dose within 24 h prior to transplant and then at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks post‐transplant


Control group
  • Placebo: Five doses of 0.2 polysorbate 80/mL. First dose within 24 h prior to transplant and then at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks post‐transplant


Baseline immunosuppression
  • CSA dose: NS

  • Azathioprine dose: NS

  • Steroid dose: NS

Outcomes
  • Mortality

  • Graft loss

  • Acute rejection

  • Infection/CMV

  • Delayed graft function

  • Malignancy

Notes Pooled analysis of Daclizumab double and triple therapy studies published after primary studies. Data used only when presented separately for each study. 3 year follow‐up
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Stated "randomised, double‐blind placebo‐controlled" no further information provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, blinding of outcome assessors not stated
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Double blind, blinding of outcome assessors not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk ITT analysis reported for the primary analyses of efficacy and safety, all patients followed up or accounted for.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Primary outcomes for this review (death, graft loss and acute rejection) have been reported. No study protocol available to assess secondary outcomes of study
Other bias High risk Supported by a grant from Hoffmann‐LaRoche Inc