Parrott 2005.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions |
Treatment group
Control group
Baseline immunosuppression
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | 1 year follow‐up | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "Computer generated randomization schedule" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "Study medication was packed sequentially and numbered... and patients were allocated to the next available treatment pack" |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind, blinding of outcome assessors not stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind, blinding of outcome assessors not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 108/113 analysed. Five excluded, 4 with no transplant, 1 with transplant but no drug. Not ITT analysis as stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcomes for this review (death, graft loss and acute rejection) have been reported |
Other bias | High risk | Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 1/5 authors Novartis employee |