ter Meulen 2002.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions |
Treatment group
Control group
Baseline immunosuppression
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Stated "randomly assigned" but no further information provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | “randomisation was carried out by opening a sealed opaque envelope with the lowest available study number at each participating centre” |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcomes | High risk | “both clinicians and patients were aware of the randomised assignment”, blinding of outcome assessors not stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes | High risk | “both clinicians and patients were aware of the randomised assignment”, blinding of outcome assessors not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Yes, ITT analysis reported, all patients followed up or accounted for (3 patients lost to follow up at 12 months) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcomes for this review (death, graft loss and acute rejection) were reported |
Other bias | High risk | Supported by grants from Roche Pharmaceuticals, Mijdrecht, and Fujisawa, Houten |