Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD003370. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003370.pub3

Rose 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods International phase IIIb/IV, 19 countries, multicentre, 112 sites, N = 713
Dec 1997 ‐ Nov 1999
Open, random assignation stratified by centre via predetermined randomisation list
Baseline characteristics well balanced
Participants Age range 27 ‐ 92y
Advanced or metastatic breast cancer with measurable and/or evaluable disease
Histologically/cytologically confirmed
Previous treatment with antioestrogen
WHO performance status 0‐2
Interventions Letrozole 2.5mg versus anastrozole 1mg
Numbers in each treatment arm: 356 versus 357
Assessable patients: 299 versus 304
Outcomes Primary ‐ TTP
Secondary‐ objective response, duration of response, rate and duration of overall clinical benefit, overall survival, general safety
Notes FU duration not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk random assignation stratified by centre
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk predetermined randomisation list
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes High risk open‐label