Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003769.pub4

Yerdel 2001.

Methods Study: prospective, randomised. Allocation: computer. Blinding: yes.
Participants 269 patients: 136 P / 133 C.
Interventions Hernioplasty
ATB: Ampicilln‐sulbactam 1,5 gr IV. MA: before the incision. Control: placebo.
Outcomes IP= 1; IC= 12
Notes Because of the high rate of wound infections, the code was broken after the discharge of patient 280 (140 patients in each group).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated code by a resident who also prepared the sealed antibiotic or placebo syringes. He was unaware of the research in progress and was never involved in surgery, data collection or patient follow‐up.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Yes
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Yes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Yes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Yes

P = prophylaxis group, C = control group, IP = infected with prophylaxis, IC = infected without prophylaxis, NM = not mentioned, ATB = antibiotic, MA = timing of prophylaxis administration