Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD003553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003553.pub3

Comparison 14. Triphasic NGM 180‐215‐250 μg and EE 35 μg versus monophasic NETA 1000 μg and EE 20 μg.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pregnancy per woman within 6 cycles 1 373 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.14, 7.14]
2 Proportion of women with spotting or breakthrough bleeding at cycle 6 1 231 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.26 [0.14, 0.51]
3 Proportion of women with amenorrhea at cycle 6 1 231 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [0.06, 0.45]
4 Total discontinuation within 6 cycles 1 373 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.68, 1.58]
5 Discontinuation due to adverse events within 6 cycles 1 373 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.50, 1.98]