Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD003553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003553.pub3

Comparison 15. Triphasic NGM 180‐215‐250 μg and EE 35 μg versus monophasic LNG 100 μg and EE 20 μg.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pregnancy per woman within 6 cycles 1 309 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.02 [0.31, 29.35]
2 Proportion of cycles with spotting within 6 cycles 1 1650 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.42, 0.81]
3 Proportion of cycles with breakthrough bleeding within 6 cycles 1 1650 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.66, 2.04]
4 Proportion of cycles with amenorrhea within 6 cycles 1 1650 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.34, 0.96]
5 Total discontinuation within 6 cycles 1 309 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.52, 1.73]
6 Discontinuations due to adverse events within 6 cycles 1 309 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.79 [0.21, 3.00]