Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;6(1):106–123. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.10

Table 4. Normal range of thoracolumbar sagittal alignment parameters stratified by sex/age.

Author Cohort description LL (°) PT (°) SS (°) PI (°) PI-LL C7-S1 SVA (mm) TK (°)
Sample Age ranges M F M F M F M F M F M F M F
Asai et al., 2017 1,461 Japanese participants stratified by sex/age <50 48±9 52±10 12±7 15±7 46±10 51±11 –11±23 –19±30 34±7 33±9
50–59 45±10 49±10 14±7 16±8 48±10 50±11 5±31 –8±26 36±9 34±11
60–69 45±12 47±13 16±7 18±9 48±10 51±10 8±35 2±33 38±9 36±11
70–79 46±13 44±14 16±8 23±10 48±9 53±11 14±39 24±43 42±12 39±13
>80 40±16 39±19 20±8 25±10 48±11 52±11 39±54 52±58 40±12 44±18
Yukawa et al., 2019 627 healthy Japanese volunteers 20–29 49±9 53±13
30–39 49±11 53±10
40–49 48±10 54±10
50–59 51±9 52±10
60–69 49±13 52±11
70–79 42±15 47±13
Dreischarft et al., 2014 323 asymptomatic volunteers 20–29 36±9 37±8
30–39 35±9 37±7
40–49 28±10 33±6
>50 29±12 29±9
Zeng et al., 2018 85 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers NA 35±12 38±12 19±9 18±7 32±6 34±7 51±9 52±8 26±42 35±3 23±13 19±9
Endo et al., 2014 86 healthy Japanese young adults NA 36±25 36±15 13±9 14±7 35±8 34±8 46±8 46±10 14±25 3±26 24±10 30±8
Oe et al., 2015 656 Japanese volunteers age >50 50–59 41±9 42±12 13±6 15±9 34±7 32±8 47±10 47±8 6±13 5±12 38±34 24±38 28±6 30±13
60–69 42±13 43±14 12±7 19±8 32±8 32±10 44±9 50±11 2±13 7±13 27±32 27±32 33±11 33±13
70–79 42±13 40±17 15±7 22±10 32±10 29±11 47±10 51±14 5±13 10±18 43±35 52±47 34±11 37±15
80–89 37±16 35±19 17±9 28±12 29±9 26±12 46±8 54±12 10±16 19±21 77±50 85±52 39±13 40±19
Araújo et al.,
2014
489 adults separated by age and sex, separately 61 62 16 16 39 39 54 54 –15 –17
<40 64 15 40 55 –40
40–64 62 15 40 52 –26
>64 61 17 38 55 2

LL, lumbar lordosis; PT, pelvic tilt; SS, sacral slope; PI, pelvic incidence; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; TK, thoracic kyphosis; TPA, T1-pelvic angle.