Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD003368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003368.pub3

Chlebowski 1983.

Study characteristics
Methods Accrual dates: not reported (accepted for publication May 1982)
Sample size: 35
Number of centres: unknown (USA)
Randomisation method: not reported
Baseline comparability: no significant imbalance apparent or reported
Participants Female
100% MBC
Unclear if this is a first line trial for MBC: 'patients admitted to study if they had failed an initial combination chemotherapy program' 'all patients received prior chemotherapy with at least cyclophosphamide and 5‐FU'. However, patients typically received prior chemotherapy of CMF or CMFP which are typically adjuvant regimens.
Age range 24‐74 years
Median 50 (both groups)
Interventions A‐CCNU vs A‐CCNU‐V
Arm I: (A‐CCNU) Doxorubicin + CCNU (lomustine)
Arm II: (A‐CCNU‐V) Doxorubicin + CCNU (lomustine) + vincristine
Outcomes Overall survival (not defined)
Response (objective response, defined as ≥ 50% reduction in tumour size)
Toxicity
Notes 35/35 evaluable for toxicity and response. Follow‐up details not reported.
‐ estimated minimum 30 months
‐ estimated maximum 30 months
Presents survival as life tables not Kaplan‐Meier curves. Time‐to‐event data extracted directly from time‐to‐event curve.
Toxicity related deaths not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Response Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Toxicity Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Overall survival Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate, outcomes reported
Other bias High risk C ‐ difference between groups in proportion of pre/post menopausal patients