Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD003368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003368.pub3

Inoue 1984.

Study characteristics
Methods Accrual dates: 01/03/1979 to not reported (date closed to accrual not reported, study closed 30/04/1983 and date submitted for publication 25/11/1983)
Unknown (Japan)
Sample size:58
Randomisation method: Envelope system
Baseline comparability: no significant imbalance apparent or reported
Participants Female
100% MBC
100% first line
Age range: 31‐69 years
Median age
Arm I: 55 years, arm II: 49 years
Anthracycline naive
Interventions ACF vs ACFM
Arm I: ACF doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + ftorafur
Arm II ACFM: arm I + methotrexate
Outcomes Overall survival
Response (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in tumour size)
Toxicity
Notes 58/60 evaluable.
2 patients excluded (ACF arm) due to protocol violation.
Survival measured from start of chemotherapy.
Follow‐up details not reported.
Based on accrual and date of submission:
‐ estimated minimum follow‐up 1 month
‐ estimated maximum follow‐up 51 months
Time‐to‐event data extracted directly from time‐to‐event curve. Toxicity related deaths not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate, envelope
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Response Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Toxicity Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Overall survival Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate, outcomes reported
Other bias High risk C ‐ 37% ACFM group had ≥3 organs involved compared to 14% in ACF group