Inoue 1984.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Accrual dates: 01/03/1979 to not reported (date closed to accrual not reported, study closed 30/04/1983 and date submitted for publication 25/11/1983) Unknown (Japan) Sample size:58 Randomisation method: Envelope system Baseline comparability: no significant imbalance apparent or reported | |
Participants | Female 100% MBC 100% first line Age range: 31‐69 years Median age Arm I: 55 years, arm II: 49 years Anthracycline naive | |
Interventions | ACF vs ACFM Arm I: ACF doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + ftorafur Arm II ACFM: arm I + methotrexate |
|
Outcomes | Overall survival Response (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in tumour size) Toxicity | |
Notes | 58/60 evaluable. 2 patients excluded (ACF arm) due to protocol violation. Survival measured from start of chemotherapy. Follow‐up details not reported. Based on accrual and date of submission: ‐ estimated minimum follow‐up 1 month ‐ estimated maximum follow‐up 51 months Time‐to‐event data extracted directly from time‐to‐event curve. Toxicity related deaths not reported. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate, envelope |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Response | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Toxicity | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Overall survival | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate, outcomes reported |
Other bias | High risk | C ‐ 37% ACFM group had ≥3 organs involved compared to 14% in ACF group |