Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD003368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003368.pub3

Lokich 1977.

Study characteristics
Methods Accrual dates: April 1975 to March 1976
Sample size: 43
Number of centres: unknown (USA)
Randomisation method: not reported
Baseline comparability: imbalance reported with more patients in MA group having skin metastases (15 vs 10), longer disease‐free interval (27 (range 0‐72) vs 8 (range 0‐48) months) and duration of metastases
Participants Female
Age range 39‐78 years (median 53 (MA) and 59 (MAC))
100% MBC
100% first line unclear: 9/43 had received prior chemotherapy but unclear if this was for metastatic disease
Interventions MA vs MAC
Arm I: (MA) melphalan + doxorubicin
Arm II: (MAC) melphalan + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide
Outcomes Response (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in tumour size)
Duration of response
Toxicity
Notes 40/43 evaluable: reason for exclusion, early death at 3 weeks (1), low dosage of drug therapy with death at 6 weeks (1), absence of measurable disease at 7 weeks (1). 
1 treatment related death: severe sepsis (MAC arm) 
Doses of the same chemotherapy agent are reduced in the addition of a drug arm.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Response Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Toxicity Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Duration of response Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate, outcomes reported
Other bias High risk C ‐ Inadequate, MA group had longer disease free interval and more skin metastases compared to MAC group.