Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD003368. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003368.pub3

Stein 1992.

Study characteristics
Methods Accrual dates: March 1987 to May 1990
Sample size: 114
Number of centres: unknown (UK)
Randomisation method: not reported
Baseline comparability: no significant imbalance apparent or reported
Participants Female
Age range: mean 61‐62 years
Unclear % MBC (advanced and progressive disease)
Approx 90% first line for MBC
Interventions 2M vs 3M
Arm I: (2M) mitozantrone + methotrexate
Arm II: (3M) mitozantrone + methotrexate + mitomycin‐C
Outcomes Response
Toxicity
Notes 107/114 eligible: reason for exclusion, randomised in error (4), primary site of cancer in doubt (3).
Toxic related deaths not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Response Low risk A ‐ Adequate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Toxicity Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate, outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk A ‐ Adequate