Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD003415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003415.pub4

3. Published numerical data from trials Magill 1995.

Changes from baseline in symptoms
  median reductions (interquartile range)
  progesterone placebo significance
highest scoring symptom per protocol      
cycle 1 (n=50 /43) ‐9 (‐16 to ‐5) ‐4 (‐12 to 0) P<0.01
cycle 2 (n=49/43) ‐9 (15 to ‐6) ‐5 (‐10 to ‐1) P<0.01
cycle 3 (n=42/38) ‐10 (‐16 to ‐5) ‐8 (‐13 to ‐2)  
cycle 4 (n=41/31) ‐10 (‐16 to ‐5) ‐5 (‐12 to 0) P< 0.05 
highest scoring sympton in intention to treat analysis not recorded not recorded not recorded
average symptom score per protocol      
cycle 1(n=50 /43)    ‐7 (‐12 to ‐4) ‐4 (‐10 to 0) P<0.01
cycle 2 (n=49/43       ‐7 (‐12 to ‐5) ‐5 (‐9 to 0) P< 0.05 
cycle 3 (n=42/38)     ‐10 (‐12 to ‐5) ‐6 (‐11 to ‐2) P< 0.05 
cycle 4 (41/31)     ‐10 (‐14 to ‐2) ‐4 (‐10 to 0)  
average syptom score in intention to treat analysis      
cycle 1 (n=73/57) ‐5 (‐9 to ‐1) ‐2 (‐7 to 2) P< 0.05
cycle 2 (n=66/57) ‐5 (‐10 to ‐2) ‐3 (‐8 to 1)  
cycle 3 (n=58/51) ‐6 (‐10 to 0) ‐3 (‐8 to 1)  
cycle 4 (n=57/43) ‐4 (‐10 to 1) ‐4 (‐10 to 2)