Cortes 2007.
Methods | Randomisation: method not stated, "randomly divided into two groups". Blinding: not stated. |
|
Participants | Inclusions: 40 women, singleton, term in labour at 4 to 5 cm dilatation. Exclusions: none stated. No. lost to follow‐up: 0 |
|
Interventions | Epidural: 20 women received 8 mL bupivacaine 0.25% (20 mg) with adrenaline and fentanyl 100 µg followed by intermittent bolus of 4 mL bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline as required. CSE: 20 women received fentanyl 25 µg intrathecally followed by intermittent epidural boluses as above. Supplementation of 6 mL was available for both groups for delivery. |
|
Outcomes | Maternal: VAS scores at 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes post initial injection; the number who mobilised; the occurrence of hypotension, pruritus, respiratory depression and nausea/vomiting. The mode of delivery was also noted. Neonatal: Apgar scores. |
|
Notes | Brazil ‐ translated. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Stated only, "randomly divided into two groups". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All the data are available. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes are all reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias evident. |