Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD003487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003487.pub3

Drew 1979.

Methods Quasi‐randomised controlled trial
Participants 66 appropriate for gestational age infants of birth weight < 1500 g
Infants who were receiving assisted ventilation were not included
Interventions Nasojejunal (N = 32) versus nasogastric feeding (N = 34) until achieving an enteral intake of 200 ml/kg/day
Outcomes Gain in weight, length, and head circumference prior to hospital discharge, calorie intake, and adverse events (including death, necrotising enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, and aspiration pneumonia)
Notes Setting: University of Melbourne, Australia, 1974‐1977
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Alternate allocation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Alternate allocation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Unblinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Nasojejunal group: 11 infants withdrawn after allocation; 1 required assisted ventilation, 10 because of failure to pass the feeding tube
Nasogastric group: 11 infants withdrawn after allocation; 5 required assisted ventilation, 4 died within 24 hours, 2 had "insufficient data to compute"