Drew 1979.
| Methods | Quasi‐randomised controlled trial | |
| Participants | 66 appropriate for gestational age infants of birth weight < 1500 g Infants who were receiving assisted ventilation were not included |
|
| Interventions | Nasojejunal (N = 32) versus nasogastric feeding (N = 34) until achieving an enteral intake of 200 ml/kg/day | |
| Outcomes | Gain in weight, length, and head circumference prior to hospital discharge, calorie intake, and adverse events (including death, necrotising enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, and aspiration pneumonia) | |
| Notes | Setting: University of Melbourne, Australia, 1974‐1977 | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Alternate allocation |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Alternate allocation |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Nasojejunal group: 11 infants withdrawn after allocation; 1 required assisted ventilation, 10 because of failure to pass the feeding tube Nasogastric group: 11 infants withdrawn after allocation; 5 required assisted ventilation, 4 died within 24 hours, 2 had "insufficient data to compute" |