Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;8(5):237. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.154

Table 6. Univariate and multivariate analysis of MAF and other tumor features for recurrence by cox regression model.

Clinicopathologic parameters Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P value* HR (95% CI) P value*
Age, y: <60 vs. ≥60 0.588 (0.237–1.460) 0.252
Gender: female vs. male 1.992 (0.572–6.943) 0.279
ctDNA MAF: decreased vs. increased 16.827 (6.383–44.358) <0.001 21.469 (7.497–61.480) <0.001
Cirrhosis: no vs. yes 0.879 (0.334–2.317) 0.795
Tumor size, cm: <5 vs. ≥5 2.215 (0.839–5.845) 0.108
Tumor number: single vs. multiple 1.858 (0.874–3.951) 0.107
MVI: no vs. yes 5.103 (1.183–22.008) 0.029 6.378 (1.449–28.070) 0.014
Tumor encapsulation: no vs. yes 0.664 (0.319–1.382) 0.274
Edmonson grade: I + II vs. III + IV 1.344 (0.621–2.909) 0.453

*, analysis by cox regression, with P<0.05 considered significant. MAF, mutant allele frequency; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; MVI, microvascular invasion.