Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;8(5):186. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.122

Table 2. Measurement of the indices in the individual group as referred to endoscopy, P values of CT for the detection of esophageal varices (EV) of each index.

Variable Training cohort (n=95) Validation cohort (n=41) Estimate risk* P value**
Non-conspicuous EV (n=21) Conspicuous EV (n=74) Non-conspicuous EV (n=9) Conspicuous EV (n=32)
EVG, n
   I 5 2 5 3 1
   II 10 5 17 10 1.70 (0.39–7.36) 0.478
   III 6 2 52 19 8.67 (1.93–38.85) 0.005
EVD, cm 6.13 (4.82–7.81) 5.34 (4.16–7.31) 4.41 (3.44–5.12) 4.56 (3.98–4.83) 1.7 (1.23–2.36) 0.001
CSA, cm2 69.07 (28.75–138.44) 61.21 (29.92–85.92) 24.77 (11.44–34.25) 23.27 (20.27–31.71) 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 0.003
EVV, cm3 1.95×103 (1.03×103–5.14×103) 2.01×103 (8.36×102–3.26×103) 5.42×102 (4.12×102–1.46×103) 1.10×103 (6.8×102–1.37×103) 1.0008 (1.0002–1.0013) 0.006
SV, cm3 7.33×105 (5.30×105–1.06×106) 8.62×105 (5.17×105–1.38×105) 6.79×105 (3.91×105–8.27×105) 4.47×105 (3.48×105–7.64×105) 1 (1,1) 0.107
DLGV, cm 6.00 (5–7.75) 6.00 (4.00–7.25) 4.00 (3.00–5.00) 4.00 (4.00–5.00) 1.41 (1.04,1.89) 0.026

*, the estimated risk of EV-relevant indices with univariable analysis; **, t-test or chi-square test P values between the non-conspicuous EV group and the conspicuous EV group of both cohorts. EV, esophageal varices; EVG, EV grade; EVD, EV diameter; EVV, EV volume; SV, spleen volume; DLGV, diameter of left gastric vein.