Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;8(5):192. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.72

Table 3. Prognostic factors for PFS for ICC patients after surgery.

Factor Univariate analysis Multivariate analysisc
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age ≥60 years 0.848 (0.579–1.240) 0.395
Female 0.841 (0.576–1.227) 0.365
BMI ≥24 kg/m2 1.057 (0.722–1.548) 0.775
Comorbidity 0.819 (0.559–1.200) 0.306
ASA score 3–4 1.347 (0.701–2.587) 0.371
Preoperative therapy 0.989 (0.666–1.469) 0.956
Adjuvant therapy 1.203 (0.585–2.473) 0.616
Cirrhosis 1.170 (0.794–1.725) 0.427
HBsAg (+) 1.188 (0.764–1.848) 0.444
Microvascular invasion 1.441 (0.851–2.439) 0.174
T3–T4 stage 1.717 (1.111–2.652) 0.015
Complication 1.004 (0.680–1.481) 0.985
Lymph node metastasis <0.001 0.006
   Undissected lymph node Reference Reference
   Negative lymph node 1.168 (0.725–1.883) 0.523 1.521 (0.786–2.945) 0.213
   Positive lymph node 2.821 (1.668–4.771) <0.001 2.945 (1.426–6.084) 0.004
Tumor size ≥5 cm 1.308 (0.898–1.905) 0.162
Multiple metastases 1.757 (1.120–2.757) 0.014 2.177 (1.266–3.744) 0.005
Poorly differentiation 1.409 (0.949–2.091) 0.089 1.657 (1.039–2.643) 0.034
Hemi-hepatectomy 1.245 (0.850–1.824) 0.260
Tumor location
   Left liver lobe Reference
   Right liver lobe 0.876 (0.645–1.188) 0.394
   Other 0.879 (0.653–1.184) 0.397
Operation time ≥230 mina 1.420 (0.973–2.071) 0.069
Blood loss ≥300 mL 1.759 (1.186–2.608) 0.005 1.842 (1.145–2.962) 0.012
Tumor location
   Central tumor Reference
   Edged tumor 1.338 (0.920–1.946) 0.127
TBIL ≥21 μmol/L 0.901 (0.483–1.682) 0.744
AST ≥40 U/L 1.571 (0.879–2.808) 0.127
ALT ≥50U/L 1.952 (1.085–3.510) 0.026
GGT ≥60 U/L 1.246 (0.850–1.825) 0.260
Preoperative CA19-9 ≥871.65 U/mLa 2.762 (1.696–4.496) <0.001
Preoperative D-dimer ≥0.365 mg/La 1.717 (1.176–2.507) 0.005
Preoperative CEA ≥2.53 ng/mLa 1.876 (1.271–2.770) 0.002
Preoperative FIB ≥3.67 g/La 2.069 (1.361–3.146) 0.001
The prognostic value on CPDC scoreb <0.001
   CPDC =0 Reference
   CPDC =1 1.348 (0.843–2.154) 0.213
   CPDC =2 3.117 (1.808–5.374) <0.001

a, ROC curves were constructed to estimate the optimal cutoff value; b, because the CPDC score was based on the D-dimer levels and CA19-9 levels, the multivariate analysis of prognostic value of CPDC score included factors with a P<0.1 in univariate analysis exclude of the D-dimer levels and CA19-9 levels; c, clinicopathological factors with a P<0.1 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox regression models. Forward: LR was used in multivariate analysis. PFS, progression-free survival; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; HBsAg, serum hepatitis B surface antigen; TBIL, total bilirubin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, gamma glutamyl transferase; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; FIB, fibrinogen; CPDC, combination of preoperative D-dimer and CA19-9; BMI, body mass index; LR, likelihood ratio.