Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;8(5):223. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.03

Table 5. Univariate analysis and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analysis of potential risk factors for LFFR, OS, DFFR, DFS.

Variables Category Univariate Multivariate
LFFR OS DFFR DFS LFFR OS DFFR DFS
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Gender Male vs. female 1.85 0.46–7.39 0.390 0.25 0.032–1.85 0.170 0.77 0.26–2.26 0.64 0.66 0.26–1.71 0.390
Age <60 (n=109) vs. ≥60 (n=39) 4.01 1.07–15.00 0.039 6.28 2.31–17.08 0.0003 1.45 0.60–3.52 0.41 2.20 1.10–4.40 0.026 3.42 0.91–12.89 0.070 4.98 1.81–13.67 0.0019 1.69 0.81–3.50 0.16
T stage T1,2 vs. T3,4 3.95 0.49–31.67 0.200 1.58 0.51–4.85 0.430 1.56 0.62–3.95 0.35 2.07 0.90–4.76 0.088
N stage N0,1 vs. N2,3 0.39 0.10–1.44 0.160 1.51 0.43–5.25 0.520 3.58 0.84–15.23 0.08 1.22 0.53–2.79 0.065
TNM stage III vs. IVa 2.78 0.69–11.19 0.150 7.21 2.05–25.29 0.002 3.02 1.28–7.10 0.01 2.80 1.38–5.69 0.0043 4.66 1.06–20.41 0.041 2.86 1.22–6.75 0.016 2.2 0.91–5.32 0.08
GTVnx (cm3) ≤42.7 (n=88) vs. >42.7 (n=60) 5.98 1.23–28.90 0.026 4.21 1.48–12.00 0.007 1.25 0.55–2.83 0.59 2.04 1.03–4.01 0.040 5.24 1.074–25.57 0.041 1.52 0.45–5.21 0.500 1.14 0.50–2.59 0.76
GTVrLNs (cm3) ≤0.79 (n=66) vs. >0.79 (n=82) 1.14 0.30–4.24 0.850 0.39 0.14–1.11 0.076 0.62 0.28–1.40 0.25 0.56 0.28–1.12 0.100
GTVp (cm3) ≤42.87 (n=84) vs. >42.87 (n=64) 5.52 1.14–26.70 0.034 3.93 1.38–11.22 0.01 1.39 0.62–3.14 0.42 2.17 1.10–4.30 0.026

LFFR, local failure-free rate; OS, overall survival; DFFR, distant failure-free rate; DFS, disease-free survival.