Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar;8(5):230. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.32

Table S2. Summary of the estimates and GRADE evidence in the analyses of clinical outcomes.

Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality (importance)
No. Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Immunotherapy Conventional therapy Relative (95% CI) Absolute
Overall survival
   14 Randomized trials No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None detected Not applicable HR 0.65 (0.57 to 0.74) Not applicable ⊕⊕⊕⊕High (critical)
Progression-free survival
   15 Randomized trials No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None detected Not applicable HR 0.81 (0.75 to 0.86) Not applicable ⊕⊕⊕⊕High (critical)
1-year overall survival
   14 Randomized trials, samples: 1,858, events: 1,682 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None detected 883/956 (92.4%) 799/902 (88.6%) RR 1.04 (1.01 to 1.07) 27 more per 1,000 (from 0 more to 53 more) ⊕⊕⊕⊕High (critical)
Moderate 90.4% 27 more per 1,000 (from 0 more to 54 more)
3-year overall survival
   12 Randomized trials, samples: 1,624, events: 1,272 No serious risk of bias Seriousa No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None detected 697/841 (82.9%) 575/783 (73.4%) RR 1.11 (1.03 to 1.20) 81 more per 1,000 (from 22 more to 147 more) ⊕⊕⊕O Moderate (critical)
Moderate 78% 86 more per 1,000 (from 23 more to 156 more)
5-year overall survival
   8 Randomized trials, samples: 1,126, events: 693 No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None detected 387/595 (65%) 306/531 (57.6%) RR 1.17 (1.06 to 1.28) 81 more per 1,000 (from 12 more to 150 more) ⊕⊕⊕⊕High (critical)
Moderate 52% 73 more per 1,000 (from 10 more to 135 more)

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of the effect; ⊕⊕⊕O Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of the effect and may change the estimate; ⊕⊕OO Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of the effect and is likely to change the estimate; ⊕OOO Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate. a, downgraded (−1) for inconsistency: heterogeneity greater than 50% was observed in this subgroup. RR, risk ratio; HR, hazard ratio; and CI, confidence interval.