Skip to main content
. 2014 May 27;2014(5):CD003463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003463.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Nitroderivatives for chronic asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi infection.

Nitroderivatives for chronic asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi infection
Patient or population: people with chronic asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi infection
 Intervention: nitroderivatives
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Nitroderivatives
ECG Abnormalities ‐ RCT data ‐ benznidazole Study population OR 0.41 
 (0.07 to 2.31) 235
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low
43 per 1000 18 per 1000 
 (3 to 94)
Moderate
41 per 1000 17 per 1000 
 (3 to 90)
Progression of cardiomyopathy: non‐RCT data ‐ adults ‐ nitroderivatives 
 Emergence of substantial changes in the diagnostic tests or clinical status, or both (see text) Study population OR 0.74 
 (0.32 to 1.73) 986
 (4 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low
118 per 1000 90 per 1000 
 (41 to 187)
Moderate
116 per 1000 89 per 1000 
 (40 to 185)
Mortality: non‐RCT data ‐ adults ‐ nitroderivatives 
 All‐cause mortality Study population OR 0.55 
 (0.26 to 1.14) 3396
 (6 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low
44 per 1000 25 per 1000 
 (12 to 50)
Moderate
55 per 1000 31 per 1000 
 (15 to 62)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; ECG: electrocardiogram; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.