Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD003525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003525.pub2

Comparison 4. Percutaneous tenotomy versus ESWT.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mean pain at night at 12 months (0‐100 point VAS) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Mean pain at rest at 12 months (0‐100 VAS) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Mean pain on pressure at 12 months (0‐100 VAS) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Mean pain on Thomsen test at 12 months (0‐100 VAS) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Mean pain on chair test at 12 months (0‐100 VAS) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Proportion with treatment success at 12 months 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected