Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003495.pub3

Chez 2000.

Methods Cross‐over 
 Double blind 
 Blinding of outcome assessor unclear 
 1/25 LTFU
Participants Autism or PDD‐NOS (DSM‐IV) 
 6yrs ± 2.4 
 22 males, 3 females
Interventions Treatment: porcine secretin 2CU/kg IV single dose at baseline or wk 4 
 Control: IV saline, single dose at baseline or wk 4
Outcomes CARS 
 Parent reported outcomes
Notes Biased sample ("responders") from non‐controlled trial. Secretin in this trial each child's 2nd dose
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Alternating schedule at entry
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not specified
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk "Double blind" but blinding of outcome assessors unclear
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 4% loss to follow‐up