Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;59(14):5696–5705. doi: 10.1002/anie.201912745

Table 2.

Comparison of the selected bond distances (Å) and relative single‐point energies (kcal mol−1) obtained from the optimized geometries of 3 at different spin states (closed shell singlet state and triplet state); BS (broken‐symmetry state) (1,1) at +26.6 kcal mol−1 (Supporting Information).

Complex

3 (S=0)

3 (S=1)

3 (Exp.)

Cu−C

1.8872/1.8874

1.9106/1.9104

1.867(4)–1.880(3)

Cu−NPy

2.0204/2.0201

2.2058/2.2061

1.965(3)–1.974(3)

Cu−NMeCN

2.3293

2.1730

2.315(3)/2.326(4)

E rel

0

25.2