Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;59(14):5526–5530. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915155

Table 1.

Comparison of the aldehyde substrate scope of OXCMe and HACLHs.[a] Inline graphic

Aldehyde

R

Product name

OXCMe [c]

HACLHs [c]

2 a

H

glycolyl‐CoA

100

11

2 b

Me

lactyl‐CoA

74

100

2 c

CH2Me

2‐hydroxybutyryl‐CoA

5

100

2 d

CH2OH

glyceryl‐CoA

1

100

2 e

CHOHCH2OH

erythronyl‐CoA

n.d.[b]

n.d.[b]

2 f

COOH

tartronyl‐CoA

n.d.[b]

n.d.[b]

2 g

(CH2)2COOH

2‐hydroxyglutaryl‐CoA

1

100

2 h

Ph

mandelyl‐CoA

100

3

2 i

CH2Ph

3‐phenyllactyl‐CoA

22

100

[a] The reaction contained 2 a2 i (10 mm), formyl‐CoA (1 mm), OXCMe or HACLHs (5 μm). Products were analyzed by LC‐MS after 1 h reaction time. [b] Product not detected. [c] Relative activity in %. Relative activity refers to the comparison of OXCMe and HACLHs for each aldehyde substrate.