Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;59(14):5738–5746. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914061

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Mechanistic investigation. a) Reaction conducted in CD3CN and DMF‐d6. b) 2 equiv D2O was added. c) Formation of CsDCO3 via direct or indirect H/D exchange with D2O. d) Z/E‐isomerization via energy transfer using photocatalyst Pc4. e) CV measurement of Pc4. f) Steady‐state Stern–Volmer experiment of Pc4 and Boc‐Pro‐OCs (2 a+Cs2CO3). g) Phosphorescence lifetimes of 3*Pc4 at different concentrations of quencher (2 a+Cs2CO3). h) Combined quenching data of steady‐state and time‐resolved studies of Pc4. i) Stern–Volmer analysis yielded a rate constant, k ET, of (3.12±0.12)×109 L mol−1 s−1 by the SET between 3*Pc4 and Boc‐Pro‐OCs (2 a+Cs2CO3). The backward reaction rate is negligible. j) Steady‐state Stern–Volmer quenching analysis of Pc1 in the presence of Boc‐Pro‐OCs (2 a+Cs2CO3), phenylacetylene 1 a or p‐bromoacetophenone 5 i.