Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 13;3(4):e202605. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2605

Table 2. Association Between Mode of Delivery With Obesity in Offspring Among 33 226 Women.

Mode of delivery Obese participants, No./total No. (%)a Offspring obesity
RR (95% CI) P value
Overall 12 156/33 226 (36.6) NA NA
Vaginal 11 722/32 137 (36.5) 1 [Reference] NA
Cesarean 434/1089 (39.9)
Crude 1.09 (1.01-1.18) .02
Adjustedb 1.11 (1.03-1.19) .005
Additional analysis
Marginal structural model estimate 434/1089 (39.9) 1.11 (1.03-1.19) <.001
Maternal BMI as continuous variablec 434/1089 (39.9) 1.11 (1.03-1.19) .006
Allowing obesity status to change over time 434/1089 (39.9) 1.18 (1.08-1.29) <.001
Women who remained obese during follow-up (n = 31 867) 391/1046 (37.4) 1.13 (1.05-1.22) .002

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); NA, not applicable; RR, relative risk.

a

Body mass index of 30 or higher.

b

Adjusted models included terms for maternal age at delivery, race/ethnicity (white or other), maternal educational level (≥high school or ≥college), maternal prepregnancy BMI group (<18.5, 18.5-24.99, 25-29.99, or ≥30), gestational weight gain (<9.1 kg or ≥9.1 kg), maternal height, gestational diabetes (yes or no), preeclampsia (yes or no), pregnancy-induced hypertension (yes or no), year of birth (1946-1951, 1952-1961, or 1962-1964), gestational age at delivery (<37, 37-39, 40-42, or ≥43 weeks), birth weight group (<2.3, 2.3-3.1, 3.2-3.8, 3.9-4.4, or ≥4.5 kg), smoking during pregnancy (no, first trimester, second and third trimesters, or current), and region of residence at birth (Northeast, Midwest, West, or South).

c

Adjusted model modeling prepregnancy BMI as a continuous variable with a linear term and a quadratic term.