Table 2.
Species | Treatment | Essential Oil Component % | AOA mg GAE g−1 |
Phenolics mg GAE g−1 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. dracunculus | Control | Methyl charvicol | 79.3 | 58.3 | 18.5 |
AMF | 81.1 | 58.8 | 18.6 | ||
ns | ns | ns | |||
L. angustifolia | Control | Linalool | 34.6 a | 67.9 | 19.8 |
Linalyl aetate | 18.8 b | ||||
AMF | Linalool | 36.5 a | 74.1 | 19.3 | |
Linalyl acetate | 25.2 a | ||||
ns | ns | ||||
H. officinalis | Control | Isopinocamphone | 25.1 | 57.0a | 16.3 |
Pinocamphone | 10.7 | ||||
AMF | Isopinocamphone | 27.2 | 51.6b | 15.0 | |
Pinocamphone | 11.9 | ||||
ns | ns |
ns, no statistically significant difference. Within each column and each species, values relevant to the comparison between AMF and the control followed by different letters are statistically different according to Duncan’s test, at p ≤ 0.05.