Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 19;61(4):503–512. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13129

Table 3.

Proportional change in the intervention group compared with the control group, from baselinea

Outcome Comparing t 1 to t 0 Comparing t 2 to t 0 Distribution
Ratiob (95% CI) Unadjusted p‐value Holm's adjusted p‐valuec Ratiob (95% CI) Unadjusted p‐value Holm's adjusted p‐valuec
Primary outcomes
ECBI: intensity score 0.9636 (0.9152–1.0147) .1592 1.000 0.9645 (0.9092–1.0232) .2296 1.0000 Gaussian
ECBI: problem score 0.8897 (0.8043–0.9841) .0232 .534 0.9833 (0.8578–1.1271) .8082 1.0000 Gaussian
Positive Parenting: frequency 1.1015 (1.0534–1.1518) <.0001 .003 0.9897 (0.9461–1.0352) .6498 1.0000 Gaussian
Positive Parenting: problem 0.8036 (0.6807–0.9486) .0100 .250 1.0719 (0.8707–1.3195) .5131 1.0000 Negative Binomial
Nonviolent Discipline 1.0397 (0.9397–1.1502) .4508 1.000 1.1669 (1.0432–1.3053) .0071 .199 Negative Binomial
Physical Discipline 0.7230 (0.5821–0.8981) .0035 .091 0.9583 (0.7451–1.2325) .7401 1.0000 Negative Binomial
Psychological Discipline 0.8642 (0.7354–1.0157) .0770 1.000 1.0516 (0.8744–1.2646) .5933 1.0000 Negative Binomial
Observed Positive Parenting 1.3914 (1.2940–1.4962) <.0001 .003 1.2410 (1.1301–1.3628) <.0001 .003 Poisson
Observed Positive Child Behavior 1.1098 (1.0578–1.1644) <.0001 .003 1.1675 (1.0943–1.2456) <.0001 .003 Poisson
Observed Negative Parenting 1.0353 (0.8909–1.12031) .6510 1.000 0.8330 (0.6923–1.0022) .0528 1.000 Poisson
Observed Negative Child Behavior 1.1003 (0.9019–1.3425) .3462 1.000 1.2009 (0.8558–1.6852) .2895 1.000 Poisson
Secondary outcomes:
Caregiver Depression 0.7990 (0.6675–0.9565) .0148 .355 0.9343 (0.7752–1.1260) .4756 1.0000 Negative Binomial
Caregiver Social Support 0.9949 (0.9258–1.0691) .8881 1.000 1.0088 (0.9335–1.0901) .8250 1.0000 Gaussian
Poor Monitoring and Supervision 1.0391 (0.9881–1.0929) .1359 1.000 1.0132 (0.9608–1.0685) .6289 1.0000 Negative Binomial
Parenting Stress (reversed)d 0.9276 (0.8832–0.9742) .0028 .076 0.9576 (0.9098–1.0079) .0976 .5856 Negative Binomial
a

Models controlled for child age and sex, and community.

b

Ratio of change from t 0 to t 1 or t 2 in intervention group to change from t 0 to t 1 or t 2 in control group as estimated by exp(ß) for the interaction effect between group and time components.

c

Adjusted for 30 comparisons, to account for two comparisons for each of 15 outcomes.

d

Parenting Stress was reversed to improve model fit; decreased scores imply increase in parenting stress.