Table 4. Binding and Signalling Parameter Estimates for His1- and Phe1-Containing Chimeric Ligandsa.
Equilibrium binding | cAMP |
β-arrestin-2 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pKi (M) | pEC50 (M) | Emax (%) | log τ/KA (M) | pEC50 (M) | Emax (%) | log τ/KA (M) | |
GLP-1 | 8.5 ± 0.1 | 9.4 ± 0.1 | 100 | 9.3 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 111 ± 7 | 6.4 ± 0.1 |
GLP-1-phe1 | 6.9 ± 0.1*,# | 8.1 ± 0.2*,# | 100 | 8.1 ± 0.1*,# | 5.7 ± 0.1*,# | 61 ± 7*,# | 5.4 ± 0.1*,# |
Chi1 | 8.6 ± 0.1 | 9.5 ± 0.1 | 100 | 9.5 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 108 ± 6 | 6.6 ± 0.1 |
Chi1-phe1 | 6.9 ± 0.1*,# | 8.1 ± 0.2*,# | 100 | 8.1 ± 0.2*,# | 5.6 ± 0.0*,# | 55 ± 7*,# | 5.2 ± 0.1*,# |
Chi2 | 8.7 ± 0.2 | 10.0 ± 0.1* | 100 | 9.9 ± 0.1* | 7.0 ± 0.1* | 108 ± 6 | 7.0 ± 0.1* |
Chi2-phe1 | 6.4 ± 0.1*,# | 8.8 ± 0.2*,# | 100 | 8.7 ± 0.2*,# | 5.9 ± 0.0*,# | 62 ± 5*,# | 5.5 ± 0.1*,# |
Chi3 | 9.5 ± 0.1* | 9.9 ± 0.1* | 100 | 9.8 ± 0.1* | 7.0 ± 0.1* | 105 ± 7 | 7.0 ± 0.1 |
Chi3-phe1 | 8.3 ± 0.1# | 9.4 ± 0.2# | 100 | 9.3 ± 0.2# | 6.3 ± 0.1# | 53 ± 5*,# | 5.9 ± 0.1 # |
Ex-ala2 | 9.8 ± 0.1* | 10.0 ± 0.1* | 100 | 10.0 ± 0.1* | 7.3 ± 0.1* | 105 ± 8 | 7.2 ± 0.1* |
Ex-ala2-phe1 | 8.4 ± 0.1# | 9.8 ± 0.1* | 100 | 9.8 ± 0.1* | 6.7 ± 0.1# | 51 ± 5*,# | 6.2 ± 0.0 # |
Ex4 | 9.9 ± 0.1* | 10.0 ± 0.1* | 100 | 10.1 ± 0.1* | 7.2 ± 0.1* | 87 ± 4 | 7.0 ± 0.1 |
Ex-phe1 | 7.8 ± 0.1*,# | 9.0 ± 0.2*,# | 100 | 8.9 ± 0.2*,# | 6.0 ± 0.2 # | 12 ± 1*,# | 4.6 ± 0.2*,# |
GLP-1-gly2 | 7.2 ± 0.1* | 8.8 ± 0.1* | 100 | 8.8 ± 0.1* | 5.8 ± 0.0* | 101 ± 5 | 5.8 ± 0.0* |
GLP-1-gly2-phe1 | 6.5 ± 0.2*,# | 7.0 ± 0.2*,# | 100 | 7.1 ± 0.2*,# | 4.8 ± 0.2*,# | 16 ± 1*,# | 3.6 ± 0.3*,# |
Mean ± SEM signaling parameter estimates from data shown in Figure 2 and Figure S-2, n = 5 experimental repeats. Binding experiments were performed in HEK293-SNAP-GLP-1R cells, signaling experiments were performed in CHO-K1-βarr2-EA-GLP-1R cells. Signaling parameter estimates were determined from 3-parameter fitting. Emax values are expressed relative to the global maximum for full agonists in each assay. All compounds are full agonists for cAMP in this assay, so Emax was globally constrained to 100%. *p < 0.05 versus GLP-1, and #p < 0.05 for Phe1 ligand versus corresponding His1 ligand, determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test.