Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 13;21:228. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03238-w

Table 4.

Description of the FDH, HRQoL, and QoL perspective based on ICF linking

Percentage of total citations Measure to ICF linkage Dominant ICF Component Dominant intention Instrument recommendations
ASES 21% 100% Activity Functional outcome FDH instrument focusing on activity concerns
VAS-pain 17% 100% Body function Pain evaluation FDH instrument for pain
SST 12% 100%

Activity

Body function

Functional outcome FDH instrument focusing on activity and body function
SANE & SSV 8% 0 none Functional outcome HRQoL
Patient satisfaction 5% 0 none Patient satisfaction Unknown
SF-12 3% 92% Participation QoL FDH instrument focusing participation with HRQoL feature
SPADI 3% 100%

Activity

Body function

Functional outcome FDH instrument focusing on activity and body function
DASH 3% 100%

Activity Participation

Body function

Functional outcome FDH instrument with HRQoL
WOOS 2% 95%

Activity

Body function

Functional outcome FDH instrument focusing on activity and body function with HRQoL and QoL feature
Quick-DASH 2% 100% Participation Functional outcome FDH instrument focusing on participation
OSS 2% 100% Activity Functional outcome FDH instrument focusing on activity concerns
PENN 1% 92% Activity Functional outcome FDH instrument focusing on activity with HRQoL feature

FDH Functioning, disability and health

HRQoL Health-related quality of life

QoL Quality of life

ASES American Shoulder and Elbow Society

SST Simple Shoulder Test

DASH Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand

WOOS Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score

PSS PENN shoulder score

NRS Numerous Numeric rating scales

VAS Visual analog pain scales

SANE Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation

SSV Subjective Shoulder Value

SPADI Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

OSS Oxford Shoulder Scale