Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 1;4(3):71–77. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-04-071

Table 2.

Tools currently being used to identify frailty.

Integrated AMU (n=45) Geriatric AMU (n=16) General AMU (n=10) Community (n=67) Orthopaedic units (n=77) Other surgical units (n=41)
Electronic frailty index 6 (13) 1 (6) 0 (0) 21 (31) 5 (6) 2 (5)
Rockwood CFS 15 (33) 7 (44) 3 (30) 31 (46) 23 (30) 17 (41)
Timed up and go 2 (4) 2 (13) 1 (10) 16 (24) 9 (12) 5 (12)
PRISMA-7 1 (2) 1 (6) 0 (0) 7 (10) 2 (3) 1 (2)
Edmonton Frail Scale 4 (9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 8 (12) 9 (12) 6 (15)
One or more frailty syndromes 15 (33) 8 (50) 3 (30) 19 (28) 31 (40) 12 (29)
Gait speed 2 (4) 1 (6) 0 (0) 11 (16) 1 (1) 1 (2)
Frailty index from CGA 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 8 (12) 1 (1) 0 (0)
Grip strength 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (6) 4 (5) 3 (7)
ISAR tool 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0)
No tool 5 (11) 2 (13) 0 (0) 2 (3) 22 (29) 9 (22)
Fried frailty score 1 (2) 1 (6) 0 (0) 4 (6) 3 (4) 2 (5)
Other 8 (18) 6 (38) 3 (30) 1 (1) 4 (5) 5 (12)
Don’t know 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (2)

N=number of organisations responding. CGA: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. CFS: Clinical Frailty Scale. ISAR: Identification of Seniors at Risk. PRISMA: Program of Research on Integrations of Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy.