Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 2;22(2):134–139. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_78_19

Table 1.

Stricture characteristics and outcomes of the urethroplasties using buccal mucosa graft

One-stage repair (n=59, 42.5%) Staged repair (n=80, 57.5%) Comparison (P)
Etiology, n (%)
 LS 31 (52.5) 17 (21.3) <0.0001
 Hypospadias 23 (39.0) 59 (73.8)
 Other* 5 (8.5) 4 (5.0)
Stricture location, n (%)
 Navicular fossa 23 (39.0) 4 (5.0) <0.0001
 Distal penile 35 (59.3) 29 (36.2)
 Mid-penile 1 (1.7) 18 (22.5)
 Proximal penile 0 (0) 29 (36.2)
Procedure, n (%)
 Primary 35 (59.3) 15 (18.8) <0.0001
 Redo 24 (40.7) 65 (81.2)
Stricture length (cm), mean (range) 2.8 (1.3–6.0) 4.5 (2.0–12.0) <0.00001
Length of follow-up (month), mean (range) 25.6 (6.4–91.2) 32 (6.1–115.3) 0.045
Success rate, n (%) 53 (89.8) 65 (81.3) 0.163
Failures, n (%)
 Restricture 3 (5.1) 8 (10.0) 0.892
 Urethrocutaneous fistula 3 (5.1) 6 (7.5)
 Unsatisfied with cosmesis 0 (0) 1 (1.2)
Mean improvement in Qmax (ml s−1) 28.0 26.2 0.795

*Catheter-related strictures, TURP-related strictures. BMG: buccal mucosa graft; TURP: transurethral resection of the prostate; LS: lichen sclerosus