Ortiz 2002.
Methods |
Design: parallel group randomized trial Duration of study: 2000 Follow‐up: 21–30 days |
|
Participants |
Country: Peru Setting: not reported Age: 4–11 years (mean 7.9 years) Sex: not reported Number included in study: 210 Inclusion criteria: aged 2–11 years with eggs of A lumbricoides,T trichiura,or Hymenolepis nana in a faecal sample Exclusion criteria: not reported Lost at follow‐up: 22 (10.5%) Number positive for A lumbricoides: 70 Number included in review: 63 |
|
Interventions |
Treatment strategy: screening and treat the positive
|
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes included:Ascaris prevalence pre‐ and post‐treatment, cure rates, pre‐ and post‐treatment GM epg, ERR, adverse events Outcomes not included in review: anthelmintic efficacy for Trichuris and Hymenolepis; efficacy of praziquantel for A lumbricoides |
|
Notes |
Diagnostic technique: Kato‐Katz Funding support: Romark Laboratories (Tampa, Florida, USA) provided the nitazoxanide suspension and gave financial support. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "the children were randomized to treatment with either nitazoxanide suspension or the comparator drug." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Different treatment schedule. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Details not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 22 (10.5%) participants lost at follow‐up, dropouts not balanced among groups and not included in analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All stated outcome were reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Financial support by Romark laboratories. |