Watkins 1996a.
Methods |
Design: parallel group randomized trial Duration of study: February to October 1993 Follow‐up: 14 days |
|
Participants |
Country: Republic of Guatemala Setting: school Number included in study: 246 Age: ≤ 12 years(mean 9.8 years) Sex: not reported Inclusion criteria: girls and boys aged ≤ 12 years who had not taken any deworming medicine in the past year Exclusion criteria: pregnancy Lost at follow‐up: 22 (8.8%) Number positive for A lumbricoides: 209 Number included in review: 209 |
|
Interventions |
Treatment strategy: screening and treat all included participants
|
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes included:Ascaris cure rates and pre‐ and post‐treatment AM and GM epg Outcomes not included in review: anthropometric measures, anthelmintic efficacy for Trichuris |
|
Notes |
Diagnostic technique: modified Kato‐Katz Funding support: Pew Charitable Trusts, the US Agency for International Development University Development and Linkage Program, the Children's Miracle Network Telethon, and the ARCS Foundation |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Children were stratified by sex and age and then randomly assigned." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The children and field workers were unaware of treatment group assignment." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Although the 2‐week posttreatment egg examination made it clear to the study director, which treatment was which, this information was not communicated to the field workers." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 22 (8.8%) participants lost at follow‐up and not included in analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Adverse events not reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No obvious source of other bias. |