Table 3.
Genea | Everob | Gefb | E + Gb | p /Everoc | p /Gefc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGFR | 1,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | 0,178 | 0,113 |
MYC | 1,2 | 0,5 | 1,7 | 0,361 | 0,121 |
CDKN1C | 0,9 | 0,0 | 1,2 | 0,474 | 0,048 |
CASP9 | 0,7 | 0,4 | 1,1 | 0,445 | 0,117 |
KRAS | 0,4 | 0,5 | 1,0 | 0,503 | 0,556 |
IGFR | 0,5 | 0,3 | 1,0 | 0,080 | 0,060 |
VEGFA | 0,1 | 0,2 | 1,0 | 0,056 | 0,219 |
CDH1 | 0,4 | −0,3 | 1,0 | 0,390 | 0,245 |
TP53 | 0,2 | 0,5 | 0,9 | 0,003 | 0,164 |
BRAF | 0,4 | 0,6 | 0,9 | 0,493 | 0,435 |
CCNE1 | −0,3 | −0,1 | −1,0 | 0,247 | 0,050 |
CHEK1 | −0,6 | −0,3 | −1,0 | 0,357 | 0,086 |
CHEK2 | −0,6 | −0,3 | −1,0 | 0,268 | 0,358 |
CCNA1 | −1,1 | 0,2 | −1,2 | 0,713 | 0,024 |
FOS | 0,8 | −1,4 | −1,4 | 0,081 | 0,826 |
CCNB1 | −1,1 | −0,4 | −1,7 | 0,148 | 0,015 |
aList of genes that were 2-fold up- or downregulated after combination treatments.
bData are presented as log2 of the average relative quantification after everolimus (100 nM) and gefitinib (5 µM) treatments as single agents (Evero; Gef) and in combination (E + G). A value of 1 corresponds to a two-fold upregulation and a value of −1 corresponds to a two-fold downregulation.
cStatistical differences between combination and everolimus (p/Evero) or gefitinib (p/Gef) treatments were assessed using Student’s t-test.