Table 6.
Regression models for updated regulation adherence.
| Six or less regulations met | All 7 regulations met | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | ||||
| Model 1. Characteristics associated with adherence with meal regulations | ||||
| CACFP status | 3.95 (2.44, 6.40)** | 3.87 (2.38, 6.31)** | ||
| Yes | 42 (21.4) | 69 (51.9) | ||
| No | 154 (78.6) | 64 (48.1) | ||
| RUCA Status | ||||
| Urban | 163 (78.7) | 103 (76.9) | ||
| Large Rural City | 15 (7.3) | 9 (6.7) | 0.95 (0.40, 2.25) | 0.92 (0.37, 2.31) |
| Small rural town | 21 (10.1) | 9 (6.7) | 0.68 (0.30, 1.54) | 0.66 (0.28, 1.56) |
| Isolated rural town | 8 (3.9) | 13 (9.7) | 2.57 (1.03, 6.42)* | 2.23 (0.82, 6.08) |
| Independent | 0.78 (0.47, 1.30) | |||
| Yes | 161 (78.2) | 98 (73.7) | ||
| No | 45 (21.8) | 35 (23.6) | ||
| Mean (SD) | ||||
| Total Capacity | 88.3 (94.82) | 98.3 (69.72) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | |
| Weekly rate for age 2–5 years | 232.7 (215.69) | 249.6 (207.79) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | |
| Less than 3 regulations met | 3 regulations met | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
| n (%) | ||||
| Model 2: Characteristics associated with compliance with Drink regulations | ||||
| CACFP status | 1.05 (0.58, 1.90) | |||
| Yes | 20 (32.3) | 87 (33.1) | ||
| No | 42 (67.7) | 174 (66.7) | ||
| RUCA Status | ||||
| Urban | 53 (80.3) | 207 (77.2) | ||
| Large Rural City | 4 (6.1) | 20 (7.5) | 1.28 (0.42, 3.90) | |
| Small rural town | 4 (6.1) | 25 (9.3) | 1.60 (0.53, 4.80) | |
| Isolated rural town | 5 (7.6) | 16 (6.0) | 0.82 (0.29, 2.34) | |
| Independent | 1304 (0.55, 1.95) | |||
| Yes | 49 (75.4) | 204 (76.1) | ||
| No | 16 (24.6) | 64 (23.9) | ||
| Mean (SD) | ||||
| Total Capacity | 122.59 (137.17) | 86.00 (66.11) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.00)* | 0.995 (0.992, 0.999)* |
| Weekly rate for age 2–5 years | 164.20 (101.38) | 253.38 (223.96) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.01)* | 1.006 (1.002, 1.009)* |
*
p < 0.05;
**
p < 0.001.