Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD003940. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003940.pub3

Murray 1997.

Methods Multicentre, open‐label study.
Location of study: USA
Loss to follow‐up: unclear
Analysis: no ITT
Participants Inclusion criteria: immunocompromised ‐ HIV and other causes; >13 yrs; clinical and mycological confirmed OPC
Exclusion criteria: presence of perioral lesions only, signs and symptoms suggestive of esophageal candidiasis, history of hepatic abnormalities, or clinical evidence of hepatic disease within 2 months of entering the study, life expectancy of < 1 month, history of hypersensitivity to imidazole or azole compounds, patients requiring therapy with histamine2‐receptor antagonists, antacids, rifampicin, rifabutin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, terfenadine, astemizole.
162 enrolled 
 123 HIV/AIDS 
 ‐ Itraconazole group = 61 
 ‐ Clotrimazole group = 62
Diagnosis confirmed: yes ‐ culture
Interventions Itraconazole oral solution: once each day two 10mL aliquots of solution were to be swished vigorously in the mouth for several seconds and then swallowed
Clotrimazole troches: 5 troches taken daily, each dissolved slowly in the mouth.
Duration: 14 days. 
 If clinical response to treatment at day 14 then observed for another month
Outcomes Primary: Clinical cure judged on symptoms, extent of oral lesions and culture. Cured (clearance of symptoms), improved (minimal symptoms remaining with no residual visible lesions), unchanged or deteriorated.
Secondary: recurrence of other fungal infections
Adverse events: GIT symptoms mainly. 7 patients in itraconazole group and 3 in clotrimazole group had to discontinue study participation prematurely as a result of adverse events.
Notes Ethics: approval obtained from each clinical centre IRB; written informed consent
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Method how generated not stated
Allocation concealment? High risk Not reported
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk Investigator assessing the outcome was blinded.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Loss to follow‐up unclear. No ITT