Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD003940. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003940.pub3

Vazquez 2002.

Methods Treatment study. A single‐centre study conducted from July 1997 to December 1998 in the USA
Loss to follow‐up: 5 of the 27 enrolled participants did not complete treatment. Does not give breakdown per study arm.
Analysis: Modified intention to treat analysis done where all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study medication were included
Participants Inclusion criteria: between 18 and 65 years of age; HIV positive; presenting with clinical signs of oropharyngeal candidiasis confirmed on KOH and subsequent culture; failed to respond to 14 days or more of 400mg fluconazole daily
27 patients enrolled 
 13 ‐ alcohol based melaleuca oral solution 
 14 ‐ alcohol‐free melaleuca oral solution
Interventions alcohol based melaleuca oral solution ‐ 15 ml 4 times daily 
 alcohol‐free melaleuca oral solution ‐ 5 ml 4 times daily 
 Swish for 30‐60 seconds then expel; no rinsing afterwards for at least 30 minutes
Duration: 2 weeks
Add 2 weeks therapy if clinical improvement but nor complete clinical response at end of 2 weeks
Outcomes Clinical and mycological response. 
 Clinical assessments were graded as cured (clearance of all symptoms and signs), improved (minimal signs or symptoms remaining), unchanged or deteriorated. An assessment at the end of therapy of cured or improved was considered clinical response. Mycological cure was defined as <20 CFU/ml. Mycological response was defined as a significant decrease in CFU/ml from the baseline yeast count. Overall response was then defined as a clinical plus a mycological response.
Adverse events: oral burning experience in 8 receiving alcohol based solution and 2 receiving the alcohol free solution.
Notes Ethics: ethics approval obtained; informed consent obtained
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Method of sequence generation not reported
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk Reported as "open‐label"
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk