Wright 2009.
Methods | Single Centre study conducted at the Moretele Hospice, South Africa Study period: 10 days Loss to follow‐up:
Analysis: ITT as well as analysis of only those who completed study. |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: HIV+; positive diagnosis of oral thrush; currently not on any medication for oral thrush; willing to participate Exclusion criteria: Patients who did not have thrush at the time of the study. Patiens not expected to remain alive for the study period of 10 days. Grading and diagnosis of oral thrush according to Oral thrush scale. 90 patients enrolled and randomised.
Duration: 10 days. |
|
Interventions | Gentian violet: 0.5% aqueous solution Lemon juice:20 ml lemon juice diluted with 10 ml water; 2‐3 drops 3 times per day Lemon grass: 12.5ml dried lemon grass in 500 ml boiling water. Drink 125 ml first day and thereafter 250 ml daily |
|
Outcomes | Clinical success Clinical failure Adverse events reported:
|
|
Notes | Ethics: Signed informed consent before participation. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear risk | Random allocation, but method of sequence generation not reported |
Allocation concealment? | Low risk | Identical, sealed, opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes. |
Blinding? All outcomes | High risk | Nothing reported regarding blinding. Difficult to blind gentian violet. |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Low risk | Analysis ITT as well as analysis of only those who completed study. |