Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5

Comparison 2. Early versus conventional loading.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Patients with prosthesis failures 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.0 [0.63, 39.67]
2 Patients with implant failures 2 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.55 [0.46, 5.18]
3 Marginal bone level changes 2 70 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.04 [‐0.15, 0.07]