Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5

Comparison 3. Immediate versus early loading.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Patients with prosthesis failures 4 438 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.25, 1.87]
2 Patients with implant failures 5 468 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.26, 1.64]
3 Marginal bone level changes 3 136 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.06 [‐0.16, 0.03]