Comparison 4. Occlusal versus non‐occlusal loading.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Patients with prosthesis failures | 2 | 88 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.0 [0.31, 3.22] |
2 Patients with implant failures | 2 | 88 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.0 [0.31, 3.22] |
3 Marginal bone level changes | 2 | 78 | Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.03 [‐0.10, 0.15] |