Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Comparison 2. Main analysis: patient‐reported or observer‐reported outcomes.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Patient‐reported binary outcomes 31 4046 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.86, 1.00]
2 Observer‐reported binary outcomes 13 1995 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.85, 1.02]
3 Patient‐reported continuous outcomes 109 8000 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.26 [‐0.32, ‐0.19]
4 Observer‐reported continuous outcomes 49 2513 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.13 [‐0.24, ‐0.02]