Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Klerman 1974.

Methods Design: 2 x 3 factorial design (high and low personal interaction versus amitriptyline, placebo, no treatment) 
 Purpose: examine the effect of amitriptyline, placebo and psychotherapy treatment on relapse of depression
Participants Patients: out‐patients with neurotic depression having improved markedly after 1 to 2 months amitrityline medication 
 Baseline comparability: yes
Interventions Placebo: 
 ‐continuous treatment with tablets containing no amitriptyline (content NS) 
 Untreated: 
 ‐tablet treatment discontinued (observational group) 
 Experimental: 
 ‐continuous treatment with amitriptyline tablets
(Co‐intervention: no)
Outcomes Number of patients with relapse of depression 
 Residual symptoms of depression 
 Social adjustment
Notes As the high and low personal interaction treatments showed no significant difference the 2 x 3 factorial design was collapsed into a three group parallel trial.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider Low risk '... in a double‐blind controlled manner..'
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk NS
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Unclear risk Not relevant (binary outcome)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 50
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Drop‐out > 15% or NS