Klerman 1974.
| Methods | Design: 2 x 3 factorial design (high and low personal interaction versus amitriptyline, placebo, no treatment) Purpose: examine the effect of amitriptyline, placebo and psychotherapy treatment on relapse of depression | |
| Participants | Patients: out‐patients with neurotic depression having improved markedly after 1 to 2 months amitrityline medication Baseline comparability: yes | |
| Interventions | Placebo:
‐continuous treatment with tablets containing no amitriptyline (content NS)
Untreated:
‐tablet treatment discontinued (observational group)
Experimental:
‐continuous treatment with amitriptyline tablets (Co‐intervention: no) |
|
| Outcomes | Number of patients with relapse of depression Residual symptoms of depression Social adjustment | |
| Notes | As the high and low personal interaction treatments showed no significant difference the 2 x 3 factorial design was collapsed into a three group parallel trial. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear risk | NS |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | NS |
| Blinding? Treatment provider | Low risk | '... in a double‐blind controlled manner..' |
| Blinding? Outcome assessor | Unclear risk | NS |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | High risk | Drop‐out > 15% or NS |
| Free of selective reporting? | Unclear risk | No protocol available |
| Free of other bias? | Low risk | |
| No signs of variance inequality or skewness? | Unclear risk | Not relevant (binary outcome) |
| Trial size > 49? | Low risk | N = 50 |
| Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% | High risk | Drop‐out > 15% or NS |