Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.pub3

Lin 2002.

Methods Design: three group parallel trial 
 Purpose: study the analgesic effect of electroacupuncture
Participants Patients: postoperative patients (hysterectomy) 
 Baseline comparability: yes
Interventions Placebo: needling without electrical stimulation at ST‐36 
 Untreated: no needling 
 Experiemental: needling with electrical stimulation at ST‐36 
 (Co‐intervention: pethidine and morphine at request)
Outcomes Use of morphine (mg at 8, 16 and 24 hours) 
 Pain 
 Time to first pethidine dose 
 Heart rate 
 Blood pressure 
 Oxygen saturation
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk 'computer‐generated'
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk NS
Blinding? 
 Treatment provider High risk Not described as double‐blind (placebo/acupuncture)
Blinding? 
 Outcome assessor Unclear risk NS
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐out < 15%
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No protocol available
Free of other bias? Low risk  
No signs of variance inequality or skewness? Low risk No variance inequality (F‐test not statistically significant) and no skewness (1.64 standard deviations does not exceed the mean)
Trial size > 49? Low risk N = 50
Clearly concealed allocation + trial size > 49 + drop‐out max 15% High risk Allocation not clearly concealed